![]()
That is a wrong stereotype you are making. you could say we make big moneys because we use linux which is stable and handles all the load we put on it. we use linux for a lot of computers connected to our machines. ![]() Ideology has nothing to do with the current state of the linux operating system. I’m not 18 anymore and have no time for playing those ideology GNU/FOSS/freedom& bull games. ![]() Now I intent to use the industry’s proprietary standard… once MS Office 2010 is released for Mac. On Mac I’ve used iWork: Overall ok but has its compatibility issues with ODF and several MS formats. #Openoffice libreoffice or neooffice mac osFinally switched over to Mac OS and never looked back at Linux although I adore Vim and the command line interface. Used OpenOffice for a couple of months or at least tried to use this bull*. Their objective is not to maximise profits, but rather to reduce costs. #Openoffice libreoffice or neooffice freeCo-operative businesses have a long history in free enterprise economies. Such an arrangement is called a “co-operative” business. If there is an independent non-profit organisation, it can accept contributions (including code, funding and all other kinds of help) from anyone and everyone, to everyone’s benefit. If LibreOffice has only one corporate sponsor, then it will run into the same problems as Sun’s OpenOffice and IBM’s Symphony Office. BTW, AFAIK, at this point, LibreOffice IS Go-OO. They really need a corporate sponsor if they want to compete with MS Office. I can’t imagine a lot of open source developers wanting to spend their weekend stepping through. A application of that size and scope requires a lot of difficult and unsatisfying work. #Openoffice libreoffice or neooffice fullBut Sun also had paid developers working full time and OO is not really that appealing to hobbyists compared to other projects. I think it will certainly attract open source developers that didn’t like how Sun kept control over the project. If LibreOffice can be run as a more typical open source community participation project, it should advance by leaps and bounds. I have been critical of the common assumption that OpenOffice is community developed when the vast majority of the commits have been from Sun employees. In fact, haven’t you yourself criticised OpenOffice in the past along exactly those lines? Heh? I was talking about GO-OO which has long been a mod.Īll parties contribute, the best contributions are incorporated, everyone owns the result, everyone’s costs are reduced, everyone wins. One of the most important changes is the removal of Sun’s requirement that copyright be assigned to them, which acted as a barrier to participation.įor now, major distributions such as Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, and SUSE will ship LibreOffice instead of OpenOffice, and a beta release has been made available which at this point obviously doesn’t differ much from the regular OpenOffice build. #Openoffice libreoffice or neooffice codeMuch of the early work will focus on polishing the code and lots of clean-up work, but in the future we can expect a more responsive and hopefully a more productive development cycle. Oracle has also been invited to support The Document Foundation, for instance by donating the OpenOffice brand. #Openoffice libreoffice or neooffice softwareThe Document Foundation and LibreOffice can already count on pretty much the entire Free software ecosystem, with all the major players pledging support the Free Software Foundation, Google, Novell, Red Hat, Canonical, the OSI, the GNOME Foundation, NeoOffice, Credativ, NeoOffice, and others. “We believe that the Foundation is a key step for the evolution of the free office suite, as it liberates the development of the code and the evolution of the project from the constraints represented by the commercial interests of a single company,” states Sophie Gautier, long-time OpenOffice community member and former maintainer of the French language project, “Free software advocates around the world have the extraordinary opportunity of joining the group of founding members today, to write a completely new chapter in the history of FLOSS.” They don’t say it explicitly, but the rather uncomfortable position Oracle takes towards Free/open source software certainly plays a role in this. The main focus seems to be to free OpenOffice from the oversight of any single commercial, and to turn it into a true community project. In the press release sent out by The Document Foundation, the team details why the fork was deemed necessary. ![]() This should break OpenOffice free from the shackles of Sun/Oracle, hopefully leading to a faster and more inclusive development cycle. LibreOffice is the provisional name of a community-led fork of OpenOffice that is to be developed under the umbrella of a European based non-profit to be named The Document Foundation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |